Microsoft released the “top feature request list” which is created from the feedbacks of Windows users. The features aren’t listed in a particular order, they break down into various categories depending on which part of Windows the feature request falls under. Many features are about IE and Office implementation like “session restore function” and “download manager in IE”. There are even requests like “ability to back up Xbox 360 games to a PC“. You can see the top feature request list here.
Microsoft will use a bare-bones version of the Windows kernel, called MinWin, as the starting point for the development of future products, including Windows 7 and Windows Server. Continue reading »
Today, while i was datamining the web to get more information about Windows 7, i found this webpage. It is telling that Eric Traut talked about Windows 7 on 13rd October. You can watch the full video of the presentation at this link or you can see Long’s blog to see his full article and watch a short (8 min.) video of the presentation.
Recent reports have surfaced stating that Microsoft has moved at least some of the development of Windows 7 to its Microsoft India location.
Currently, most details available about Windows 7 stem from speculation. What we know right now is that the system will have multiple SKUs, be available in both 32-bit and 64-bit, feature subscription-based content, and (hopefully) be released around 2010. Other possible features include enhanced virtualization capabilities and more advanced network diagnostic tools.
According to Moneycontrol India, the plan to move some of Windows 7’s development offshore was announced by Jon DeVaan, the Senior Vice President of the Windows Core Operating System Division. The team from India is a mix of Windows and Windows Live developers, and it will be led by Sunil Bansali.
As we struggle through Vista with its high resource demand, high hardware requirements, and high price, it is hard to believe that Windows 7 will be with us in about 3 years. Since Microsoft hasn’t mentioned what they have planned for us, this is a great time to think about some of the things I would like to see. I know, i’m only dreaming. But maybe, just maybe, some of the things I would like to see in Windows 7 may just come true.
Less resource demand
What about an operating system that needs 64MB Ram and 800Mhz CPU? It would be great for me. I would use it in my all computers at home
I wouldn’t have to buy a new PC for every new version of Windows as i do it now.
Pricing
I would be glad to pay only $29.90 for the new version not $199. Less is even better.
Security
It would be nice to be sure that my files are in safe. Nobody is currently stealing them or nobody is logging my keyboard. I want to install it and forget the security. Microsoft should take care of my PC.
One button Fix
There should be a button. When i press, it should fix any problems on my computer. Also there must be a Fix button in the error dialog boxes. But still i am glad that i didn’t see any “There is an unknown error in the system” error message in Vista
Thanks to Microsoft.
I hope Microsoft will hear my voice. Do you have any ideas/wishes to be heard? Please comment.
Microsoft confirmed this week that it is working on the next version of the Windows client operating system, codenamed Windows ‘7.’ While details are scarce on exactly what Windows 7 will look like or do, Microsoft is promising its largest customers that the OS will be delivered in about three years, or sometime during 2010. However, Microsoft did hint that virtualization products, now contained in the Microsoft Desktop Optimization Pack, could be a large part of the Windows 7 equation.
A Microsoft spokesperson provided a little insight into the development of Windows 7. The spokesperson says the software company is working with enterprise customers–including some on multi-year Software Assurance maintenance contracts–and business partners on Windows 7. “Microsoft is scoping Windows 7 development to a three-year timeframe, and then the specific release date will ultimately be determined by meeting the quality bar,” the spokesperson said.
A three-year timeframe would put the release of Windows 7 in 2010, which would be four years, more or less, from the time Windows Vista became available. Microsoft has said it intends to speed up the Windows development effort following the launch of Windows Vista, which suffered numerous delays and took five years to develop. Those delays could end up causing some of Microsoft’s largest customers on multi-year Software Assurance contracts to pay more for Windows Vista, which they are entitled to as part of their agreement, than if they had just purchased Vista licenses outright.
The Microsoft spokesperson also mentioned that the company is looking at ways to help customers get value from other products, such as the Microsoft Desktop Optimization Pack (MDOP), which today is available only to Software Assurance customers.
One of the key technologies included in the MDOP is the SoftGrid Application Virtualization technology, which was based on technology Microsoft obtained with its acquisition of Softricity last year. While it’s hidden away in the MDOP today, the SoftGrid technology has the potential to revolutionize how Microsoft packages and sells access to Windows.
Microsoft hasn’t said much about what it plans to do with SoftGrid, but considering Microsoft’s stated intentions to provide customers with more flexibility in how they deploy Web and desktop products–not to mention the big investment Microsoft is making in building data centers that house thousands of Web and application servers–SoftGrid could be an extremely important component of Microsoft’s strategy for selling Windows Live and Windows 7 in the future.
During a keynote on “cloud computing” at Microsoft’s partner event two weeks ago, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer promised more details on Microsoft’s strategy for using virtualization technology and large-scale server farms to deliver access to applications over the Web. “We’re going to have a lot more to talk to you about in this arena in the next 12 months,” he said.
Microsoft also confirmed that it is working on Windows Vista Service Pack 1 (SP1), but declined to provided details about when it will be available. “Our current expectation is that a beta [of Vista SP1] will be made available sometime this year,” the spokesperson said.
Windows Vista SP1 is important for two reasons. First, many corporate customers–out of superstition or just pure habit–are accustomed to waiting until the first release of a service pack before starting migrations. SP1 is important because it is assumed to contain changes that Microsoft had to make to satisfy Google’s complaint that Vista’s integrated search facility was too difficult to turn off, and made computers run slower when users switched to Google’s desktop search technology.
Published: IT Jungle July 25, 2007
Windows “Vienna” (formerly known as Blackcomb) is a codename for a future version of Microsoft Windows, originally announced in February 2000, but has since been subject to major delays and rescheduling. Microsoft now announced it will be released in 2009, and according to a magazine called “Smart Computing In Plain English”, work on it began right after Windows Vista came out. As of February 2007, the name of the operating system used internally is undisclosed and is not used publicly by Microsoft, though “Windows 7″ has been noted in job postings as a working name for the project.
Microsoft has refrained from discussing the details about “Vienna” publicly as they focus on the release and marketing of Windows Vista, though some early details of various core operating system features have emerged at developer conferences such as Windows Hardware Engineering Conference in 2006.
Development
The code name “Blackcomb” was originally assigned to Windows NT 6, an operating system that was planned to follow Windows XP (codenamed “Whistler;” both named after the Whistler-Blackcomb resort). Blackcomb would be the successor to both the desktop/workstation-oriented Windows XP (Windows NT 5.1) and the server-oriented Windows Server 2003 (Windows NT 5.2). In late 2001 the release of Blackcomb was being scheduled for 2005 and in August it was announced that a minor intermediate release, Vista (codenamed “Longhorn” after a bar in the Whistler Blackcomb Resort), would ship in 2002 to update the Windows NT 5.x line. Over the following years Longhorn morphed in fits, starts, and delays to incorporate many of the features promised for Blackcomb and was eventually designated as Windows NT 6. The status of the operating system dubbed “Blackcomb,” however, was shrouded in confusion with some reports suggesting that plans for Blackcomb were scrapped while others claiming that it would be the monicker for a server-only Windows 6.x release. More likely, the codename “Blackcomb” was discarded as no longer being in the spirit of its original intent (i.e., to describe Windows NT 6). At the present, it is believed that Windows Vista’s successor (referred to here as Windows “Vienna”) is being planned as both a client and server release with a current release estimate of late 2009, although no firm date or year has yet been publicized. A recent article provided from Yahoo!News projected the release date to be closer to 2009.
Focus
At first, internal sources pitched Blackcomb as being not just a major revision of Windows, but a complete departure from the way users today typically think about interacting with a computer. For instance, the “Start” philosophy, introduced in Windows 95, may be replaced by the “new interface” which was said in 1999 to be scheduled for “Vienna” (before being moved to Vista (”Longhorn”) and then back again to “Vienna”). While Windows Vista was intended to be an evolutionary release, Vienna was targeted directly at revolutionizing the way users of the product interact with their PCs. However, the situation has now changed. Windows Vista, which was expected to be a minor release became a major release, when it was released five years after the release of Windows XP. Windows “Vienna” will become a minor release, and is currently planned to be released two years after Windows Vista.
On February 9, 2007, Microsoft’s Ben Fathi claimed that the focus on the operating system was still being worked out, and could merely hint at some possibilities:
“We’re going to look at a fundamental piece of enabling technology. Maybe it’s hypervisors, I don’t know what it is” […] “Maybe it’s a new user interface paradigm for consumers.”
—Ben Fathi, Windows Core Operating System Division Vice President
Bill Gates, in an interview with Newsweek, also suggested that the next version of Windows would “be more user-centric.” When asked to clarify what he meant, Gates said:
“That means that right now when you move from one PC to another, you’ve got to install apps on each one, do upgrades on each one. Moving information between them is very painful. We can use Live Services to know what you’re interested in. So even if you drop by a [public] kiosk or somebody else’s PC, we can bring down your home page, your files, your fonts, your favorites and those things. So that’s kind of the user-centric thing that Live Services can enable. [Also,] in Vista things got a lot better with [digital] ink and speech but by the next release there will be a much bigger bet. Students won’t need textbooks, they can just use these tablet devices. Parallel computing is pretty important for the next release. We’ll make it so that a lot of the high-level graphics will be just built into the operating system. So we’ve got a pretty good outline.”
Other features
“Vienna” will also feature the sandboxed approach discussed during the Alpha/White Box development phase for Longhorn. All non-managed code will run in a sandboxed environment where access to the “outside world” is restricted by the operating system. Access to raw sockets will be disabled from within the sandbox, as will direct access to the file system, hardware abstraction layer (HAL), and complete memory addressing. All access to outside applications, files, and protocols will be regulated by the operating system, and any malicious activity will be (theoretically) halted immediately. If this approach is successful, it bodes very well for security and safety, as it is virtually impossible for a malicious application to cause any damage to the system if it is locked inside a metaphorical ‘glass box.’ As well, this sand boxed environment will be able to adapt itself to the code base it was written for. This will alleviate most problems that arise from back compatibility when a new operating system is made.
Another feature mentioned by Bill Gates is “a pervasive typing line that will recognize the sentence that [the user is] typing in.” The implications of this could be as simple as a “complete as you type” function as found in most modern search engines, (e.g. Google Suggest) or as complex as being able to give verbal commands to the PC without any concern for syntax. The former has been incorporated to an extent in Windows Vista.
Backward compatibility
Microsoft has stated that “Vienna” will be available in both 32-bit and 64-bit for the client version, in order to ease the industry’s transition from 32-bit to 64-bit computing. Vienna Server is expected to support only 64-bit server systems. There will be continued backward compatibility with 32-bit applications, but 16-bit Windows and MS-DOS applications will not be supported, as has been the case since the 64-bit versions of Windows XP and Windows Server 2003. However, Paul Thurrott claims in his Supersite for Windows, that according to Microsoft’s x64 migration schedule, Windows Vienna will almost certainly only ship in 64-bit editions.
Recent Comments